Twitter Updates

Tuesday, August 31, 2004

Gerardo Sandoval

Adriel Hampton gives the full scoop on the hopelessness of the campaign to re-elect Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval

Gerardo Sandoval is getting worked over royally in his District 11. The local Democratic Party last week declined to back Sandoval, with rival candidates uniting to push a "no endorsement." Behind the official story is yet another reminder that nobody forgets in San Francisco politics, let alone forgives. ...

Seems plenty of Democratic County Central Committee members remember that Sandoval had a poor attendance record when he was an elected member of that body, making meetings primarily when it was time to cast endorsement votes. His wife, Amy Harrington, also has a lackluster attendance record since her March election, but made it for the Wednesday endorsement vote. Topping that, folks are bringing up a couple of impolitic remarks Sandoval made about Jews and the Irish, back in 2001 and 2002, respectively. His apologies didn't take, apparently. ...


At this point, the story gets even more interesting as we learn of Harrington's crazed outburst after letting her husband down:


After the endorsement vote snubbing her hubby, Harrington piped up to pronounce the outcome "bulls---." DCCC member Arlo Hale Smith offered an explanation about "anti-Semitic remarks," prompting Harrington to shout another round of "This is bulls---," before threatening to resign. ... "There are lots of political reasons not to like Sandoval," said one DCCC member. "This came down to personal [reasons] for a lot of the members." ...

Remember the time Sandoval said the Fire Department employee list reads like the Dublin phone book. I went searching for the full quote, but it came from a Frank Gallagher column (07/10/02) that is lost in the gap of the Examiner's archives.Apparently, Sandoval denied making the comment. But my search did find a great H. Brown column on the subject that reads:

Sandoval imitates John Rocker To my able counterpart at the Examiner, Frank
Gallagher: Yes, Frank, Sandoval lied if he said he did not describe the San
Francisco Fire Department as being like "a Dublin" phone book." Let's see, that
makes him a lying, indecisive bigot ... a scumbag anti-Semite ... the man is
columnist material! I heard the boy make the "Dublin" comment to Joe Grubb of
the Rent Board, so it sure as hell wasn't off-camera.

Last year, under the subhead, Gerardo's Gotta Go, progressive scribe H. Brown explained the view of the left. Brown gives Sandoval an "F" grade for the year while saying, "Sandoval also ranks first in the 'horrible rumors' category. I'm gonna leave you hanging there and save the real dirt..."Brown closes by remarking, "Trust me on this one ... you can't trust him." Brown has also said, "give this man a raise so he can clean up his act, pleeeease!"Meanwhile, Joefire has noticed that every Sandoval speech on SFGTV should have the disclaimer, "Gerardo Is Running For Re-Election" and has awarded Gerardo Sandoval with a close-second in the "kicked out of the room" contest.

Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval's website demonstrates why Sandoval is just smart enough to make himself look like an imbecile.Visitors to the site get an updated greeting bragging about Supervisor Sandoval's new legislation which created a website to help seniors purchase prescription drugs from Canada. Obviously, this shows that Sandoval understands that websites can be powerful tools.Now click on the Community button and you're sent to the page where Supervisor Sandoval shows his knowledge of District 11. This is where he "Mary Harris" is spelled "Marry Harris" twice. But the real kicker is the map. Not only does the map have outdated District 11 boundaries and precinct information, but it shows a complete lack of knowledge about District 11.Sandoval knows enough about District 11 to list the contact info for CIA and New Mission Terrace-NIA, but posts a map that shows neither the Cayuga neighborhood nor Mission Terrace. Sandoval's website lists OMI-NIA and OMI-CAO, but his map neglects Merced Heights and the Oceanview, referring to the whole OMI as the Ingleside.If this is the map Sandoval has been using to guide his representation, then a whole lot is beginning to make sense.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has individual pages for each member on the official sfgov website. If you were to visit each page you'd see they are all have the same format and similar information. That is, until you visit the site for Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval.Supervisor Sandoval's page differs in that it has a big blue button in the middle linking to his Greeting Page. If you scroll to the bottom of this page, you see a button for a Private Page. A click on the Private Page button tells you the following:Disclaimer - Supervisor Sandoval Please NoticeYou are now leaving the Board of Supervisors web site for a private page maintained by Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval. Although you may find value in reading the contents of this site, the Board of Supervisors does not endorse, control, or take responsibility for this site, its views, or the accuracy of the information contained on the destination server.[Note, if you click on the Personal Link at the bottom of the Greeting Page, you are sent directly to www.gerardosandoval.org without the disclaimer.]Seal of ApprovalThe links on Sandoval's Greeting Page refer to www.gerardosandoval.org as either a "private" or "personal" page. Yet a visitor to www.gerardosandoval.org is greeted with the Official Seal of San Francisco (on every page).Here's what SF Code has to say about the City Seal:SEC. 1.6. CORPORATE SEAL.(a) A corporate seal of the City and County is hereby adopted and established as the official seal of the City and County.(b) The official seal is described as follows: A shield supported by a miner on the left and a sailor on the right, with a device of a steamship passing the Golden Gate; at the foot of the supporters, emblems of commerce, navigation and mining; at the crest, a phoenix issuing from flames, below which shall appear a motto consisting of the words "Oro en Paz - Fierro en Guerra" (gold in peace; iron in warfare); and around the margin the words "Seal of the City and County of San Francisco."(c) The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall have the custody of the corporate seal. The use of the corporate seal of the City and County of San Francisco shall be for purposes directly connected with official business of the City and County; and those matters approved by the Board of Supervisors by resolution.(d) The Clerk of the Board is empowered to authorize the use of the City seal on items that are offered for sale by the City and County of San Francisco for the purpose of promoting the City and County of San Francisco. Prior to authorizing such use, the Clerk shall procure from the Director of Administrative Services a plan describing the items that would bear the City seal. Such plan shall include the criteria used in determining the proposed items and an analysis of the marketability of each item. Only those items bearing the City seal that have been authorized by the Clerk pursuant to this Section may be offered for sale by the City and County of San Francisco. The Clerk of the Board is empowered to authorize the use of the City seal on the face of San Francisco Affinity Credit Cards and San Francisco Affinity Prepaid Phone Cards that are offered for sale in connection with San Francisco Affinity Credit Card and San Francisco Affinity Prepaid Phone Card Programs to be developed by the City.(e) Every person who maliciously or for commercial purposes, or without the prior approval of the Board of Supervisors, uses or allows to be used any reproduction or facsimile of the Seal of the City and County of San Francisco in any manner whatsoever is guilty of a misdemeanor. (Added by Ord. 534-79, App. 11/2/79; amended by Ord. 98-99, File No. 990407, App. 4/30/99)Take a moment to visit the other Supervisor's pages and you'll see that only Sandoval has added to his profile page and only Sandoval has links to outside pages. Ironically, Supervisor Sandoval uses his Greetings Page to point out that he is an attorney.

This whole Sandoval website fiasco keeps on getting weirder. Not only is Sandoval the only member of the Board of Supervisors to modify his sfgov profile page to link to an outside "private"/"personal" page displaying the City Seal, but you might be paying for www.gerardosandoval.org.Here is what you will see with a simple whois search on www.gerardosandoval.org:Registrant Name:San Francisco Board of SuperviRegistrant Organization:San Francisco Board of SuperviRegistrant Street1:Room 280Registrant Street2:1 Dr. Carlton B Goodlett PlaceRegistrant City:SAN FRANCISCORegistrant State/Province:CARegistrant Postal Code:94102Registrant Country:USIn the middle of a budget crisis, did Gerardo Sandoval really have the City pay to have a private website named after him?Compare www.gerardosandoval.org to www.jakemcgoldrick.org:Supervisor Jake McGoldrick is a first term Supervisor representing District 1. Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval is a first term Supervisor representing District 11.Supervisor McGoldrick is facing a contested re-election this fall.Supervisor Sandoval is facing a contested re-election this fall.Supervisor Jake McGoldrick has a website -- his full name dot org.Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval has a website -- his full name dot org.Supervisor McGoldrick's website lists his biography.Supervisor Sandoval's website lists his biography.Supervisor Jake McGoldrick's website has a Press Release page with his press releases.Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval's website has a News page with his press releases.Supervisor McGoldrick's website has an Events page that lists Town Hall meetings.Supervisor Sandoval's website has a Calendar page that lists Town Hall meetings.Supervisor Jake McGoldrick has a Contact Us page that lists his info at City Hall.Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval has a Contact Us page that lists his info at City Hall.Supervisor McGoldrick asks for neither money nor votes on his website.Supervisor Sandoval asks for neither money nor votes on his website.Supervisor Jake McGoldrick pays for his website with his campaign account.Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval has the City pay for his website???

The worst political website ever (sandoval2004) sheds some more light on the Supervisor from District 11.After discovering that Sandoval's last website (gerardosandoval.org) was registered by the City, I thought I'd look into who was paying for the his new site:
Registrant: Committee to Reelect Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval (37515627O) 2370 Market St. #460 San Francisco, CA 94114-1575 US Phone: 415-812-4640 Domain Name: SANDOVAL2004.COM Well, at least Sandoval is paying for the site this time. But what is he doing running his campaign for re-election in District 11 from Market Street?District 11, or Inner Siberia as it has been nicknamed, is often forgotten by the decision makers in San Francisco. So why would Supervisor Sandoval contribute to this perception by running his campaign from Market Street instead of from his District? Probably, because he doesn't care.It has already been documented that Sandoval couldn't find the OMI with a map and this latest revelation only furthers the notion that Sandoval's heart couldn't be further from District 11.

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
+ San Francisco Campaigns + San Francisco Politics + San Francisco Elections

Thursday, August 26, 2004

QOTD

"Except for the stories over the last couple of weeks about me being an - - hole, all the rest of it is bull -- ,'' Shelley said in an opening comment at the meeting with The Chronicle.


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
+ San Francisco Campaigns + San Francisco Politics + San Francisco Elections

Wednesday, August 25, 2004

VP Cheney a Newsomite

This would have been nice to say BEFORE your administration lost the battle in the Senate, but glad to see you coming around:
Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
+ San Francisco Campaigns + San Francisco Politics + San Francisco Elections

Lisa Murkowski Monarchy

Announcing the new line of Nepotism Poster Kid products.  Lisa Murkowski has been hiding from her last name, these products remind Alaskans that 'Lisa' is that Lisa.  As in Lisa MURKOWSKI.  The back reads:


Paternally Suited

Electorally Booted


For the full catelog: http://www.cafepress.com/lisamurkowski




Lisa Murkowski Monarchy - Women's Tank Top


Lisa Murkowski Monarchy - Women's Tank Top








- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
+ San Francisco Campaigns + San Francisco Politics + San Francisco Elections

Tuesday, August 24, 2004

Lisa Murkowski

Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Women's Tank Top
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Organic Cotton T-Shirt
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy T-Shirt
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Men's Sleeveless Tee
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Baseball Jersey
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Long Sleeve T-Shirt
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Women's T-Shirt
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Hooded Sweatshirt
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Sweatshirt
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Stein
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy BBQ Apron
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Bumper Sticker
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Postcards (Package of 8)
Lisa Murkowski Monarchy Messenger Bag


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
+ San Francisco Campaigns + San Francisco Politics + San Francisco Elections

Wednesday, August 18, 2004

Monday, August 16, 2004

Kevin Shelley Update

Last Thursday, I told a tale about California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley and a smear campaign that had been running for five straight days on the cover of the San Francisco Chronicle:

Diebold - Kevin Shelley
In April, California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley banned a type of Diebold touch screen in California and took the unusual step of asking the Attorney General to investigate both civil and criminal actions against the company for fraud.

Two weeks later, Walden O'Dell, the chairman and CEO of Diebold finally admitted it was a "huge mistake" for him to write -- in a Republican fundraising letter -- that he
was committed to delivering electoral votes for Bush.

Since then, Kevin Shelley has become America's leader in ensuring there is a paper trail to prevent voting fraud. When CNN needs a comment on election fraud, they interview Kevin Shelley.He's right, there should be a paper trail and strong safeguards to prevent fraud. In fact, there is not a single rational argument from the opposition, which consists mainly of diploid and other Bush operatives.

Since they can't logically argue against fair elections, they have now started an aggressive decapitiation attack against Shelley. The strategy appears to assume that an aggressive character assassination of Kevin Shelley will slow the movement and prevent reform before the election.

Later that day...

California Democratic lawmakers killed legislation on Thursday that would require electronic voting machines to offer a paper trail for the next statewide election.

Rejection of the paper-trail bill could delay, but not prevent, use of a popular safeguard on electronic voting until after the 2006 primary.

Los Angeles Democrat Judy Chu, chairwoman of the Assembly Appropriations Committee, pulled the bill from consideration, her staff said, because of concerns about cost.

A few days before, a major voting-machine manufacturer was embarrassed by the apparent failure of its latest machine to accurately reflect votes in Spanish during a demonstration in the state capital.


The Oakland Tribune continues:

California stopped short of demanding a paper trail for November. Nevada Secretary of State Dean Heller ordered it for his state. Last week, Sequoia vice president and former California assistant secretary of state Alfie Charles was showing off the new VeriVote printer that his firm is supplying to Nevada when an astute legislative aide in Johnson's office noticed two votes were missing.

Charles tried again to vote in Spanish with the same result: He cast votes on two mock ballot initiatives, but they were absent from the electronic summary screen and the paper trail.

"The paper trail itself seemed to work fine but what it revealed was when he demonstrated voting in Spanish, the machine itself did not record his vote," Chesin said.

The Tribune also notes:

Secretary of State Kevin Shelley last fall ordered all counties using touch-screen voting machines in July 2006 to produce a paper printout so that a voter could confirm their choices were properly recorded.

Perata and Sen. Ross Johnson, R-Irvine, the Senate elections committee co-chairman, put in legislation to move the deadline up to January 2006 for the so-called voter-verified paper trail. Both represent counties where electronic voting proved troublesome in the March primary. Shelley endorsed the bill.


After five days of front page smears against Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, the paper trail bill he supported dies because the cost of democracy is too expensive?

And the Trib also lets us know why it is so expensive:

Los Angeles Democrats and Republicans dominate the Assembly Appropriations Committee. County elections officials plan to purchase Diebold touch-screens as early as 2006 and have complained that requiring a paper trail will increase the cost of what will be the nation's largest single e-voting purchase.



- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress


Thursday, August 12, 2004

Diebold - Kevin Shelley

In April, California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley banned a type of Diebold touch screen in California and took the unusual step of asking the Attorney General to investigate both civil and criminal actions against the company for fraud.

Two weeks later, Walden O'Dell, the chairman and CEO of Diebold finally admitted it was a "huge mistake" for him to write -- in a Republican fundraising letter -- that he was committed to delivering electoral votes for Bush.

Since then, Kevin Shelley has become America's leader in ensuring there is a paper trail to prevent voting fraud. When CNN needs a comment on election fraud, they interview Kevin Shelley.

He's right, there should be a paper trail and strong safeguards to prevent fraud. In fact, there is not a single rational argument from the opposition, which consists mainly of diploid and other Bush operatives.

Since they can't logically argue against fair elections, they have now started an aggressive decapitiation attack against Shelley. The strategy appears to assume that an aggressive character assassination of Kevin Shelley will slow the movement and prevent reform before the election.

By aggressive character assassination, consider shell's hometown San Francisco Chronicle is in DAY FIVE of their front page smear campaign against Shelley. Somehow (act surprised), a bunch of documents "appeared" that suggest wrongdoing by a Shelley donor. Not surprising is the fact that there is no evidence Shelley knew of the wrongdoing or could have had anything to do with it. But with any smear campaign, you only find that out if you carefully read the whole story while the headlines suggest Shelley is guilty of the largest scandal since Watergate.

Democrats are standing with Shelley, not just for his singular focus on voting rights, but also for his long service as a groundbreaking progressive legislator. But the smears are taking their toll and are already hurting efforts to ensure a fair presidential election.

The current smear campaign is not without precedent. There have already been reports of FBI agents harassing people for speaking up against unsafe electronic voting.

We can't let CREEP win. We can't let the movement for fair elections slow because of these character assassination attacks. We can't abandon the Secretary of State because of the smear.

Stooping to this level is one more reason why our votes need to count -- we desperately need to get our country back on track.

If you're wondering why they are doing this to Shelley, here are two reasons:
http://www.ss.ca.gov/executive/press_releases/2004/04_030.pdf
http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/ks_dre_papers/diebold_report_april20_final.pdf

*******
http://blogswarm.blogdrive.com/archive/65.html


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Tuesday, August 10, 2004

D1: Jake McGoldrick loses re-election

Out in San Francisco's Richmond District, the locals are already writing the political obituary for Supervisor Jake McGoldrick. Sup. McGoldrick was never popular, but his re-election odds are so long that few of his supporters are wasting any time, or money, on his re-election campaign.

Recent campaign finance reports show that McGoldrick has raised only $47,486 and this is not for a lack of asking. Donors simply stopped returning McGoldrick's phone calls, oddly enough, about the time Judge Lillian Sing entered the race.

The Richmond is an Asian district and the fact that it is represented by a white guy is due to a once-in-a-lifetime situation where voters were mad enough at Willie Brown to vote out his allies without checking qualifications. The 2000 Brown-backlash gave McGoldrick a seat, but now he faces re-election by an electorate that has moved on from Willie Brown and is looking for a representative that can make progress in addressing the problems facing San Francisco.

Which doesn't fit with a supervisor nicknamed McGridlock.

Supervisor Jake McGoldrick earned the nickname McGridlock after he clogged SF's housing laws with restrictions that had just been rejected by the voters. Since then, Supervisor McGridlock has taken every opportunity to prevent solutions. The way McGridlock votes one would think he works for Chris Daly instead of the people of the Richmond.

As a point of fact, Supervisor McGoldrick brings so much baggage to the campaign that Samsonite stock doubled the first week in May when people started talking about McGoldrick's re-election. Really (SAMC).

Let's face it, Jake's a joke. Seriously, the guy could bore a statue. His campaign finance reports show that his out of district support has dried up and when he asks his constituents to help him out, they point towards the door.

In any instant runoff voting (or ranked choice voting) scenario Supervisor Jake McGoldrick loses his re-election in District 1.


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Friday, August 06, 2004

4 + 1 + 11 = 6

OK, four out of the eleven members of the Board of Supervisors are now of sound mind.

Of the other seven, Matt Smith has this to say in the SF Weekly:


San Francisco's four-year experiment in progressive empowerment -- begun when anti-growth activists took over the Board of Supervisors after year-2000 protests against the development of high-tech office space across the city -- needs to end at the polls this November. We certainly shouldn't be signing forms getting more of them on the ballot.

Despite their self-applied name, San Francisco progressives aren't a philosophical or ideological movement in any meaningful sense. Rather, they're a political faction, allied around specific, self-centered financial interests, brought to office four years ago on an anti-growth mandate. Just like other politicians, they participate in backroom deals that have the potential to help their friends, to the detriment of the rest of us. The difference with this crowd is that they concentrate their ill dealings in the most important area of policy in the city -- housing. In four brief years, they've set the livability of the city back decades.

In two in a half hours, we'll know the field of candidates running for supervisor (unless a greenie wackjob runs a write-in campaign like the campaign against Speaker Pelosi).

Once the filing deadline passes, I'll be spending a lot of time writing about the races. So come back for more, but here is the one-sentence on each race:

District 1 - Judge Lillian Sing is the most qualified candidate running in any district and will wipe the floor with McGridlock.

District 2 - Michela Alioto-Pier will coast to her first victory.

District 3 - Peskin spent two and a half years destroying his re-election chances but may have done enough in the last year pull out a another win.

District 5 - Political clusterfuck...roll of the dice.

District 7 - Newsom walks on water west of the peaks and Sean will win with the Mayor's blessing.

District 9 - The progressives are once again eating one of their own with the Green Party having a chance of knocking out Ammiano.

District 11 - Sandoval couldn't win re-election in an uncontested race.

Four years ago, the progressives were elected in a referendum on the mayor. McGridlock and Sandoval didn't win their seats, but rather the Brown allies in those districts were rejected and the pair promised to fight the mayor. This year's district elections will be a referendum on working with the Mayor to progress the City. And progress will have two more votes when the "progressives" in District 1 and 11 are sent packing.

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress


Thursday, August 05, 2004

Suspects Scores Scoop

The Usual Suspects - San Francisco's Political Homepage scooped everyone by breaking the news of Mayor Gavin Newsom's appointment of Sean Erlsbernd to the Board of Supervisors.

The following email came at 4:47 today from Ben Gettleman (who works with Alex Clemens over at Barbary Coast Consulting):

Suspects has just learned that Mayor Newsom has appointed attorney Sean Elsbernd, currently Mayor Newsom's liaison to the Board of Supervisors, and former aide to outgoing D7 Supervisor Tony Hall, to fill the District Seven Supervisorial seat.

If you aren't signed up for Suspects email alerts, here is another reason to join up:

http://www.sfusualsuspects.com/index.htm



- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Wednesday, August 04, 2004

Springsteen concerts

"We're trying to put forward a group of progressive ideals and change the administration in the White House," Springsteen told The Associated Press in the most overtly political statements of his 30-year career. "That's the success or failure, very clear cut and very simple."


http://actforvictory.org/vote_for_change/index.php
http://www.moveonpac.org/vfc/

Interview with Bruce Springsteen on George Bush:

ARE VOTERS BETTER OFF THAN FOUR YEARS AGO??
I had a job, I had a girl
I had something going mister in this world
I got laid off down at the lumber yard
Our love went bad, times got hard
Now I work down at the carwash
Where all it ever does is rain
Don't you feel like you're a rider on a downbound train

Bruce Springsteen's Downbound Train

EXPLAIN THE MESSAGE YOU HOPE TO CONVEY TO VOTERS.
There's a war outside still raging
you say it ain't ours anymore to win
I want to sleep beneath peaceful skies in my lover's bed
with a wide open country in my eyes
and these romantic dreams in my head
No retreat no surrender

Bruce Springsteen's No Surrender

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE ECONOMY?
I got a job working construction for the Johnstown Company
But lately there ain't been much work on account of the economy
Now all them things that seemed so important
Well mister they vanished right into the air
Now I just act like I don't remember
Mary acts like she don't care

Bruce Springsteen's The River

WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS ON RACE RELATIONS?
In `65 tension was running high at my high school
There was a lot of fights between the black and white
There was nothing you could do
Two cars at a light on a Saturday night in the back seat there was a gun
Words were passed in a shotgun blast
Troubled times had come to my hometown

Bruce Springsteen's My Hometown

IN THE 1980's YOU WERE A VOCAL OPPONENT OF REAGANOMICS. HOW DO YOU FEEL NOW THAT BUSH HAS RESURRECTED SUPPLY-SIDE ECONOMICS?
Well now everything dies baby that's a fact
But maybe everything that dies someday comes back...
Well I got a job and tried to put my money away
But I got debts that no honest man can pay

Bruce Springsteen's Atlantic City

WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS ON OUTSOURCING?
Now Main Street's whitewashed windows and vacant stores
Seems like there ain't nobody wants to come down here no more
They're closing down the textile mill across the railroad tracks
Foreman says these jobs are going boys and they ain't coming back to your hometown

Bruce Springsteen's My Hometown

WILL THE PRESS ACCEPT YOUR INVOLVEMENT?
I don't give a damn
For the same old played out scenes
I don't give a damn
For just the in betweens
Honey, I want the heart, I want the soul
I want control right now
talk about a dream
Try to make it real

Bruce Springsteen's Badlands






- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Monday, August 02, 2004

Ridge falls on sword to stop Kerry bounce

Tomorrow's NYT.

Reports That Led to Terror Alert Were Years Old, Officials Say

WASHINGTON, Aug. 2 -Much of the information that led the authorities to raise the terror alert at several large financial institutions in the New York City and Washington areas was three or four years old, intelligence and law enforcement officials said on Monday. They reported that they had not yet found concrete evidence that a terrorist plot or preparatory surveillance operations were still under way.


If you think this is bad, wait a few weeks for the GOP 9/11 themed convention.

While the Republican political hacks are using terror alerts to shore up their slipping poll numbers, Kerry/Edwards are offering voters a free 263 book explaining their Plan for America:
http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/our_plan_for_america.pdf


***


Matt Gonzalez really is a dipshit. No difference between the Democrats and Republicans? Bush grew up in a CIA family and learned early on to play the game like this. But Nader knows better and that is why his followers are even worse than the right-wing lemmings who won't bother to question the timing of the latest terror warning.

And Gonzo should know better too.


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress