So James Carville is mad that Rahm Emanuel left so many seats on the table (which he did). But Carville is blaming Howard Dean for not giving enough money to Rahm. This debate can be decided, now that we know where the money have gone?
Mr. Emanuel warred with Mr. Dean over his refusal to provide as much money as Mr. Emanuel said he needed.
He said Wednesday that a favored candidate, Tammy Duckworth, the severely injured Iraq war veteran running for an open Republican seat in Illinois, had lost because the Republicans had spent $1 million on negative advertisements against her in the final weekend and that he did not have the money to respond.
So if he had more money, Emanuel would have wasted it on his vanity race that most people who followed agree was gross malpractice?
I have a simple question, how can anyone with a straight face not see that Carville and Rahm are the problem and that encouraging them with money only makes the problem worse and last longer?