Twitter Updates

Tuesday, July 27, 2004

Speaker Pelosi

Speaker Pelosi. I like the sound of that. From the new site:

Welcome to SpeakerPelosi.com! This site is the headquarters for the Campaign for a New Majority, dedicated to winning a Democratic majority in the Congress this November.

Why SpeakerPelosi.com? Because when Democrats are in the majority, Nancy Pelosi, Democratic Minority Leader, will become Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House — a strong voice for Democrats, and the first female Speaker of the House in our nation's history.

Take a look around, find out why a Democratic majority is so important, how the campaign is going so far, and what you can do to get involved.


Go Nancy Go!

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Sunday, July 25, 2004

GQ's Newsom Party

Wonkette is reporting that GQ's party for Newsom is one of the hottest tickets at the Convention.


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Kerry House Party

I had fun spending a few moments checking out different cities with:

http://www.johnkerry.com/events/

They are really pushing these parties and it looks like it paid off. Moveon has joined in and I think the Kerry campaign deserves credit for their organizing work around Thursday night.

Take a few moments and check out some different zip codes on the party list above.

It is impressive.

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Friday, July 23, 2004

Kerry Convention Parties



In San Francisco, I recommend THE PLACE TO BE where you can enjoy the convention on a big screen, while sipping free beer, and helping Beat Bush with your $35 contribution to Kerry Victory 2004!

Click the animation above to find the party nearest you!

If you want to do more to Beat Bush, join the Blog Swarm.

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Salon on Newsom

Gavin Newsom's mean streets


July 23, 2004 SAN FRANCISCO -- GQ is calling him "the next Bill Clinton," but unlike Clinton, who's addressed every Democratic convention since 1988, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom won't be speaking in Boston next week. Newsom's decision to allow 4,000-plus gay couples to marry in February, before he was stopped by the courts, irritated many fellow Democrats, who feared he'd handed a perfect wedge issue to President Bush. Some party leaders even blamed Newsom for last winter's sudden speedup of a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, which seemed to gather momentum from his bold local gambit.

But don't worry about Newsom: His staff has spun the rancor of national Democrats into political gold for the new mayor, who was widely viewed as the conservative candidate in last year's election and is now beloved by local progressives. He had the last laugh on the gay marriage amendment last week, when divided Republicans couldn't even get it to the Senate floor. And while he once said he wouldn't go to Boston at all, because of the disapproval of party elders, he'll be there next week, though he'll have no speaking role. Baltimore's Martin O'Malley gets the prime-time urban mayor slot Newsom might have dreamed of, though because he's a freshman mayor it was a bit of a stretch even without the gay marriage crisis.

In an interview with Salon, Newsom talked about the urban agenda he'd pitch if he were invited to speak. Even Newsom supporters are surprised by the extent to which the man supported by downtown business has put inner-city issues on top of his governing agenda. Though tiny San Francisco doesn't evoke the images of decay and urban warfare other cities do, Newsom is battling the city's skyrocketing murder rate -- there were 54 at the midpoint this year, compared with 70 in all of 2003 -- along with chronic joblessness in its bleakest housing projects. Meanwhile, tension has increased between the city's black community, hardest hit by the crime wave, and the police charged with solving those crimes, particularly after Officer Isaac Espinoza's Easter weekend killing was followed a month later by the fatal shooting of a black suspect after a car chase.

But Newsom insists the city is on the verge of big change. I caught up with him the day the Senate voted not to consider the gay marriage amendment, as local media besieged him for reaction to the vote, which was billed locally as Gavin Newsom 1, George W. Bush 0. He was accommodating but slightly irritated that the event was upstaging his new local crusade, Project Connect, an effort to mobilize volunteers and city workers to ease the isolation of low-income neighborhoods by going door-to-door to hook up residents to whatever they need -- jobs, drug treatment, better housing. To kick it off, he blasted the Bush administration's spending billions on war with Iraq while cutting urban programs. "Give me that $200 billion and we'll invest it in the top 20 urban districts," he said to 250 cheering volunteers. "That will guarantee homeland security."

It was Newsom's third foray with the Project Connect team, but he's in the city's worst neighborhoods at least weekly now, talking with idle men in the projects, some of them gangbangers, as well as kids. The 36-year-old mayor can be easy to poke fun at -- he himself jokes about his Bobby Kennedy fixation, and it's hard not to think of his role model watching him walk through the ghetto in his shirtsleeves -- but he's also easy to underestimate. Shawn Richard of Brothers Against Guns, an ex-gang member who turned his life around after his brother was murdered nine years ago, says the mayor's constant presence in the grim Hunter's View project where Richard is based has made a huge psychic difference in the community. "I give the mayor a 10," he says. But one black leader says on background: "Is he making people feel good, or making their lives better? There's a difference."

Newsom insists he's doing both. He put more cops on the street, he says, and also increased his summer jobs program for youth by 25 percent, despite a crippling budget deficit. Even while making cuts, he notes, he's recently expanded the city's innovative universal healthcare for children program. "Nobody's writing about the fact that we have universal healthcare for newborns to 25-year-olds in San Francisco," he told me. "Write about that."

more...



- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Wednesday, July 21, 2004

Fox News

Join the Fair and Balanced Blog Swarm concerning Fox News:

Dear MoveOn member,


Our Fox campaign is becoming a major fight. The attacks are now coming from Fox -- in an attempt to intimidate other media outlets. We need your help. It's time to take this to Congress. On Friday, we'll deliver our Fox petition to members of Congress and we need to have at least 250,000 comments from across the nation. We're pushing members of Congress to make Fox come clean about its rank partisanship. Go to:


http://www.moveon.org/fox



- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Nader Factor

With Supervisor Matt Gonzalez doing everything he can to re-elect Bush, The Nader Factor has started a full campaign to blunt the efforts of those on the left working for the President


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress




Tuesday, July 20, 2004

New Blog Swarm

Blog Swarm has a new campaign on Lisa Murkowiski - Nepotism Poster Child:

Winning back the U.S. Senate starts in Alaska. The GOP is fractured because the current Republican Senator is only there because she was recently appointed by her daddy.

Lisa Murkowski is the poster child for nepotism.

Blog Swarm - "Poster Child"
Add the following links to your blog:

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski
U.S. Senator Murkowski
U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski
U.S. Sen. Murkowski
Senator Lisa Murkowski
Senator Murkowski
Sen. Lisa Murkowski
Sen. Murkowski
Lisa Murkowski
Murkowski



- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress



Monday, July 19, 2004

Bush Flip-Flops

President Bush: Flip-Flopper-In-Chief
July 7, 2004
From the beginning, George W. Bush has made his own credibility a central issue. On 10/11/00, then-Gov. Bush said: "I think credibility is important.It is going to be important for the president to be credible with Congress, important for the president to be credible with foreign nations." But President Bush's serial flip-flopping raises serious questions about whether Congress and foreign leaders can rely on what he says.

1. Bush Flip-Flop on Social Security Surplus
BUSH PLEDGES NOT TO TOUCH SOCIAL SECURITY SURPLUS... "We're going to keep the promise of Social Security and keep the government from raiding the Social Security surplus." [President Bush, 3/3/01]
...BUSH SPENDS SOCIAL SECURITY SURPLUS The New York Times reported that "the president's new budget uses Social Security surpluses to pay for other programs every year through 2013, ultimately diverting more than $1.4 trillion in Social Security funds to other purposes." [The New York Times, 2/6/02]

2. Bush Flip-Flop on Patient's Right to Sue
GOVERNOR BUSH VETOES PATIENTS' RIGHT TO SUE... "Despite his campaign rhetoric in favor of a patients' bill of rights, Bush fought such a bill tooth and nail as Texas governor, vetoing a bill coauthored by Republican state Rep. John Smithee in 1995. He... constantly opposed a patient's right to sue an HMO over coverage denied that resulted in adverse health effects." [Salon, 2/7/01]
...CANDIDATE BUSH PRAISES TEXAS PATIENTS' RIGHT TO SUE... "We're one of the first states that said you can sue an HMO for denying you proper coverage... It's time for our nation to come together and do what's right for the people. And I think this is right for the people. You know, I support a national patients' bill of rights, Mr. Vice President. And I want all people covered. I don't want the law to supersede good law like we've got in Texas." [Governor Bush, 10/17/00]
...PRESIDENT BUSH'S ADMINISTRATION ARGUES AGAINST RIGHT TO SUE "To let two Texas consumers, Juan Davila and Ruby R. Calad, sue their managed-care companies for wrongful denials of medical benefits ‘would be to completely undermine' federal law regulating employee benefits, Assistant Solicitor General James A. Feldman said at oral argument March 23. Moreover, the administration's brief attacked the policy rationale for Texas's law, which is similar to statutes on the books in nine other states." [Washington Post, 4/5/04]

3. Bush Flip-Flop on Tobacco Buyout
BUSH SUPPORTS CURRENT TOBACCO FARMERS' QUOTA SYSTEM... "They've got the quota system in place -- the allotment system -- and I don't think that needs to be changed." [President Bush, 5/04]
...BUSH ADMINISTRATION WILL SUPPORT FEDERAL BUYOUT OF TOBACCO QUOTAS "The administration is open to a buyout." [White House spokeswoman Jeanie Mamo, 6/18/04]

4. Bush Flip-Flop on Bush Flip-Flop on North Korea
BUSH WILL NOT OFFER NUCLEAR NORTH KOREA INCENTIVES TO DISARM... "We developed a bold approach under which, if the North addressed our long-standing concerns, the United States was prepared to take important steps that would have significantly improved the lives of the North Korean people. Now that North Korea's covert nuclear weapons program has come to light, we are unable to pursue this approach." [President's Statement, 11/15/02]
...BUSH ADMINISTRATION OFFERS NORTH KOREA INCENTIVES TO DISARM"Well, we will work to take steps to ease their political and economic isolation. So there would be -- what you would see would be some provisional or temporary proposals that would only lead to lasting benefit after North Korea dismantles its nuclear programs. So there would be some provisional or temporary efforts of that nature." [White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, 6/23/04]

5. Bush Flip-Flop on Abortion
BUSH SUPPORTS A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE... "Bush said he...favors leaving up to a woman and her doctor the abortion question." [The Nation, 6/15/00, quoting the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, 5/78]
...BUSH OPPOSES A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE "I am pro-life." [Governor Bush, 10/3/00]

6. Bush Flip-Flop on OPEC
BUSH PROMISES TO FORCE OPEC TO LOWER PRICES... "What I think the president ought to do [when gas prices spike] is he ought to get on the phone with the OPEC cartel and say we expect you to open your spigots...And the president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price." [President Bush, 1/26/00]
...BUSH REFUSES TO LOBBY OPEC LEADERS With gas prices soaring in the United States at the beginning of 2004, the Miami Herald reported the president refused to "personally lobby oil cartel leaders to change their minds." [Miami Herald, 4/1/04]

7. Bush Flip-Flop on Iraq Funding
BUSH SPOKESMAN DENIES NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE REST OF 2004... "We do not anticipate requesting supplemental funding for '04" [White House Budget Director Joshua Bolton, 2/2/04]
...BUSH REQUESTS ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR IRAQ FOR 2004 "I am requesting that Congress establish a $25 billion contingency reserve fund for the coming fiscal year to meet all commitments to our troops." [President Bush, Statement by President, 5/5/04]

8. Bush Flip-Flop on Condoleeza Rice Testimony
BUSH SPOKESMAN SAYS RICE WON'T TESTIFY AS 'A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE'... "Again, this is not her personal preference; this goes back to a matter of principle. There is a separation of powers issue involved here. Historically, White House staffers do not testify before legislative bodies. So it's a matter of principle, not a matter of preference." [White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, 3/9/04]
...BUSH ORDERS RICE TO TESTIFY: "Today I have informed the Commission on Terrorist Attacks Against the United States that my National Security Advisor, Dr. Condoleezza Rice, will provide public testimony." [President Bush, 3/30/04]

9. Bush Flip-Flop on Science
BUSH PLEDGES TO ISSUE REGULATIONS BASED ON SCIENCE..."I think we ought to have high standards set by agencies that rely upon science, not by what may feel good or what sounds good." [then-Governor George W. Bush, 1/15/00]
...BUSH ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS IGNORE SCIENCE "60 leading scientists—including Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors and university chairs and presidents—issued a statement calling for regulatory and legislative action to restore scientific integrity to federal policymaking. According to the scientists, the Bush administration has, among other abuses, suppressed and distorted scientific analysis from federal agencies, and taken actions that have undermined the quality of scientific advisory panels." [Union of Concerned Scientists, 2/18/04]

10. Bush Flip-Flop on Ahmed Chalabi
BUSH INVITES CHALABI TO STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS...President Bush also met with Chalabi during his brief trip to Iraq last Thanksgiving [White House Documents 1/20/04, 11/27/03]
...BUSH MILITARY ASSISTS IN RAID OF CHALABI'S HOUSE "U.S. soldiers raided the home of America's one-time ally Ahmad Chalabi on Thursday and seized documents and computers." [Washington Post, 5/20/04]

11. Bush Flip-Flop on Department of Homeland Security
BUSH OPPOSES THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY..."So, creating a Cabinet office doesn't solve the problem. You still will have agencies within the federal government that have to be coordinated. So the answer is that creating a Cabinet post doesn't solve anything." [White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, 3/19/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY "So tonight, I ask the Congress to join me in creating a single, permanent department with an overriding and urgent mission: securing the homeland of America and protecting the American people." [President Bush, Address to the Nation, 6/6/02]

12. Bush Flip-Flop on Weapons of Mass Destruction
BUSH SAYS WE FOUND THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION..."We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories...for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." [President Bush, Interview in Poland, 5/29/03]
...BUSH SAYS WE HAVEN'T FOUND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION "David Kay has found the capacity to produce weapons.And when David Kay goes in and says we haven't found stockpiles yet, and there's theories as to where the weapons went. They could have been destroyed during the war. Saddam and his henchmen could have destroyed them as we entered into Iraq. They could be hidden. They could have been transported to another country, and we'll find out." [President Bush, Meet the Press, 2/7/04]

13. Bush Flip-Flop on Free Trade
BUSH SUPPORTS FREE TRADE... "I believe strongly that if we promote trade, and when we promote trade, it will help workers on both sides of this issue." [President Bush in Peru, 3/23/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS RESTRICTIONS ON TRADE "In a decision largely driven by his political advisers, President Bush set aside his free-trade principles last year and imposed heavy tariffs on imported steel to help out struggling mills in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, two states crucial for his reelection." [Washington Post, 9/19/03]

14. Bush Flip-Flop on Osama Bin Laden
BUSH WANTS OSAMA DEAD OR ALIVE... "I want justice. And there's an old poster out West, I recall, that says, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive.'" [President Bush, on Osama Bin Laden, 09/17/01]
...BUSH DOESN'T CARE ABOUT OSAMA "I don't know where he is.You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... I truly am not that concerned about him."[President Bush, Press Conference, 3/13/02]

15. Bush Flip-Flop on The Environment
BUSH SUPPORTS MANDATORY CAPS ON CARBON DIOXIDE... "[If elected], Governor Bush will work to...establish mandatory reduction targets for emissions of four main pollutants: sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon dioxide." [Bush Environmental Plan, 9/29/00]
...BUSH OPPOSES MANDATORY CAPS ON CARBON DIOXIDE "I do not believe, however, that the government should impose on power plants mandatory emissions reductions for carbon dioxide, which is not a 'pollutant' under the Clean Air Act." [President Bush, Letter to Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), 3/13/03]

16. Bush Flip-Flop on WMD Commission
BUSH RESISTS AN OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE FAILURE... "The White House immediately turned aside the calls from Kay and many Democrats for an immediate outside investigation, seeking to head off any new wide-ranging election-year inquiry that might go beyond reports already being assembled by congressional committees and the Central Intelligence Agency." [NY Times, 1/29/04]
...BUSH SUPPORTS AN OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE FAILURE "Today, by executive order, I am creating an independent commission, chaired by Governor and former Senator Chuck Robb, Judge Laurence Silberman, to look at American intelligence capabilities, especially our intelligence about weapons of mass destruction." [President Bush, 2/6/04]

17. Bush Flip-Flop on Creation of the 9/11 Commission
BUSH OPPOSES CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION... "President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11." [CBS News, 5/23/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION "President Bush said today he now supports establishing an independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks." [ABC News, 09/20/02]

18. Bush Flip-Flop on Time Extension for 9/11 Commission
BUSH OPPOSES TIME EXTENSION FOR 9/11 COMMISSION... "President Bush and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) have decided to oppose granting more time to an independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks." [Washington Post, 1/19/04]
...BUSH SUPPORTS TIME EXTENSION FOR 9/11 COMMISSION "The White House announced Wednesday its support for a request from the commission investigating the September 11, 2001 attacks for more time to complete its work." [CNN, 2/4/04]

19. Bush Flip-Flop on One Hour Limit for 9/11 Commission Testimony
BUSH LIMITS TESTIMONY IN FRONT OF 9/11 COMMISSION TO ONE HOUR... "President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have placed strict limits on the private interviews they will grant to the federal commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks, saying that they will meet only with the panel's top two officials and that Mr. Bush will submit to only a single hour of questioning, commission members said Wednesday." [NY Times, 2/26/04]
...BUSH SETS NO TIMELIMIT FOR TESTIMONY "The president's going to answer all of the questions they want to raise. Nobody's watching the clock." [White House spokesman Scott McClellan, 3/10/04]

20. Bush Flip-Flop on Gay Marriage
BUSH SAYS GAY MARRIAGE IS A STATE ISSUE... "The state can do what they want to do. Don't try to trap me in this state's issue like you're trying to get me into." [Gov. George W. Bush on Gay Marriage, Larry King Live, 2/15/00]
...BUSH SUPPORTS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BANNING GAY MARRIAGE "Today I call upon the Congress to promptly pass, and to send to the states for ratification, an amendment to our Constitution defining and protecting marriage as a union of man and woman as husband and wife." [President Bush, 2/24/04]

21. Bush Flip-Flop on Nation Building
BUSH OPPOSES NATION BUILDING... "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road." [Gov. George W. Bush, 10/3/00]
...BUSH SUPPORTS NATION BUILDING "We will be changing the regime of Iraq, for the good of the Iraqi people." [President Bush, 3/6/03]

22. Bush Flip-Flop on Saddam/al Qaeda Link
BUSH SAYS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEEN AL QAEDA AND SADDAM... "You can't distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror." [President Bush, 9/25/02]
...BUSH SAYS SADDAM HAD NO ROLE IN AL QAEDA PLOT "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in Sept. 11." [President Bush, 9/17/03]

23. Bush Flip-Flop on U.N. Resolution
BUSH VOWS TO HAVE A UN VOTE NO MATTER WHAT... "No matter what the whip count is, we're calling for the vote. We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council. And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, to let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam." [President Bush 3/6/03]
...BUSH WITHDRAWS REQUEST FOR VOTE "At a National Security Council meeting convened at the White House at 8:55 a.m., Bush finalized the decision to withdraw the resolution from consideration and prepared to deliver an address to the nation that had already been written." [Washington Post, 3/18/03]

24. Bush Flip-Flop on Involvement in the Palestinian Conflict
BUSH OPPOSES SUMMITS... "Well, we've tried summits in the past, as you may remember. It wasn't all that long ago where a summit was called and nothing happened, and as a result we had significant intifada in the area." [President Bush, 04/05/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS SUMMITS "If a meeting advances progress toward two states living side by side in peace, I will strongly consider such a meeting. I'm committed to working toward peace in the Middle East." [President Bush, 5/23/03]

25. Bush Flip-Flop on Campaign Finance
BUSH OPPOSES MCCAIN-FEINGOLD... "George W. Bush opposes McCain-Feingold...as an infringement on free expression." [Washington Post, 3/28/2000]
...BUSH SIGNS MCCAIN-FEINGOLD INTO LAW "[T]his bill improves the current system of financing for Federal campaigns, and therefore I have signed it into law." [President Bush, at the McCain-Feingold signing ceremony, 03/27/02]

http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=42263


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Saturday, July 17, 2004

Great News from Moveon

Email from moveon

Dear MoveOn member,

Usually we ask you to take an action, but today we'd like to take just a moment to reflect on where we've come together, and to take some measure of the impact of our efforts.

In just a little over a week, the Democratic convention will begin.  The Democratic nominee, John Kerry, will finally get a chance to be heard directly by the American people, and the fight for the future of America will begin in earnest.  We knew from the very start that the Bush administration and the right wing would pull out all the stops to discredit the Democratic nominee before he even appeared at the convention. They put everything they had into it, every dollar and every conceivable misleading ad, and they failed, surprising all the pundits and political operators. We now are facing a real contest -- a real chance for change.  And we should all take a moment to appreciate this victory.

With your incredible support, the efforts of the MoveOn.org Voter Fund have been a big part of this victory. This is not a partisan victory. It is a victory for truth and accountability over distortion. We've leveled the playing field so that opponents of administration policy have a fair chance in this election. Starting last October, over 160,000 MoveOn members gave more than $10 MILLION (!) to the Voter Fund to develop and run ads in battleground states telling the truth about the Bush administration. We've reached millions of people with these messages and helped shift the opinions the hundreds of thousands, on George Bush, and on the key issues we face. Below I've attached a report, with some hard figures, that shows how important this continuous drumbeat has been. With ads on health care, the Iraq war and on American priorities -- some produced by MoveOn members themselves -- we've kept the voice of the opposition strong and clear.

What's most exciting about this victory is that it represents a sea change in how politics is done. Who would have guessed that small contributions would become more important than the big ones? Who would have guessed than an organization like the MoveOn.org Voter Fund, driven by 2.4 million MoveOn members, would set the pace in addressing the key issues in this election?

Thank you for being a part of changing the way politics is done.

Sincerely,

--Wes Boyd and the MoveOn Voter Fund team  July 17th, 2004


Results of MoveOn.org Voter Fund Advertising Program July 15, 2004 Wes Boyd

In October of last year, we asked MoveOn members if they would support an aggressive advertising program, to "get the truth out about the Bush administration" in battleground states. The response was overwhelming. We raised more than $10 million in small contributions from more than 160,000 MoveOn members. Together with $6 million in challenge grants from large contributors, this gave us a budget of almost $17 million for advertising. We engaged an excellent media firm (Zimmerman and Markman) and a research firm (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner) and developed a program to focus on five core states -- Ohio, Florida, Missouri, Nevada, and West Virginia. To break out of the traditional mold, we also started an advertising contest, to bring in fresh ideas from MoveOn members themselves.

Our program is unusual in that we take issues that are very resonant with MoveOn members, and in fact may be issues highlighted by a MoveOn advocacy campaign, and test to see if those issues move people broadly across America. Again and again, this strategy turned up tremendously powerful messages. Our first ad of this kind, $87 Billion in Iraq, aired in December and was based on MoveOn's Iraq campaign. We were skeptics of political advertising, and wanted to be certain that we were spending this money well, so we developed an elaborate testing strategy -- far beyond what others do. Every ad was first tested in the real world in a test market, with a full run of the ad in that market, against results in a comparable control market. Most campaigns just do focus groups, which we've found unreliable. As an example of the power of these ads, here are the results of the $87B in Iraq ad:


WOULD VOTE FOR

Before Advertising and After Advertising

Democratic nominee 45% to 48%

George W. Bush 44% to 40%


The $87 Billion in Iraq ad was seen by almost 20,000,000 people, an average of 11 times each, in the five target states, over the two week period it ran. As a result, according to our polling, we saw a significant shift away from President Bush and his policies, especially his policy in Iraq. People clearly responded to this message and nearly a million people shifted their thinking about the President. They also changed their thinking about the war:


FOREIGN POLICY

Before Advertising and After Advertising

Different direction 44% to 48%

Bush direction 40% to 38%


We followed this ad with two ads about the Bush administration's outrageous Medicare plans -- Rug and State of the Union -- which also really moved people in our testing. By that time, the BushIn30Seconds ad contest had yielded its winners and two of the finalists tested very well -- the winner, Child's Pay, and another finalist, Polygraph. Child's Pay focuses on the tremendous burden the Bush administration is placing on future generations through its irresponsible tax cuts. Polygraph highlights President Bush's misleading statements on Iraq. We placed these ads in the five core states in January and February. You can see all the ads placed by the MoveOn.org Voter Fund in battleground states here.

With these results, we now understood the incredible power of media to get out resonant messages, and we were very worried as we saw that the Bush campaign and others were likely to launch a media blitz in March, once the Democratic nominee was known, with the intention of a preemptive political strike against the new nominee and the administration's opposition. We expanded our efforts to the entire seventeen battleground states at that key moment, and together with others, successfully blunted this unprecedented media blitz from the right-wing -- almost $60M in March and April from the Bush campaign alone. In those keys weeks, we played our contest winning ad, Child's Pay, and a new ad about the Bush administration's attempt to reduce overtime pay -- our Worker ad. The results: in June, national polling showed Senator Kerry actually leading Bush nationally by a couple points and leading by up to five points in the battleground states, an extraordinary result given the overwhelming resources the Bush campaign brought to bear.

Essentially, the Bush message didn't resonate. And ours did. And with your help, these messages got out in these key states.

Since March, we've focused on a combined program with the Media Fund, to continue to keep up the pressure in five core states. We've just received the latest tracking polls, which now fully document the impact of our program over the last eight months. Key findings from Stan Greenberg team's research include:

1. Our issue advertising has achieved deep and nearly universal penetration in these target states -- greater than the recall of anti-Kerry or pro-Kerry advertising -- despite the fact that there is more money behind other advertising.

2. In the target states, the presence of continuing opposition issue ads is producing less recall of the Bush campaign's anti-Kerry advertising. Raising real issues in our ads has the effect of neutralizing the Bush campaign attack ads.

3. We are making gains on key issues related to the advertising, particularly Iraq, corporate influence and health care. The ads produced significant changes, compared to the control states and nationally, on Iraq, Bush's corporate ties and health care and prescription drugs.

As part of the launch of each of these ads, we've typically run "earned media" campaigns with both national and local press. The PR campaigns amplify our online campaigns and have given MoveOn.org Voter Fund and MoveOn members extraordinary national impact and exposure in the last eight months. We believe this national presence has been a key part of establishing a strong opposition voice against the Bush Administration. Of course, this new prominence comes with its costs. The right-wing apparatus now has us on their radar -- including Matt Drudge, Fox News, the Republican National Committee, and the Bush Campaign. They have launched a series of attacks to attempt to discredit and silence us. But they have failed.

One prong of this attack is the persistent attempt to characterize one of the 1500 entries in the BushIn30Seconds contest -- the now infamous "Hitler ad" -- as an ad somehow supported and aired by MoveOn. Of course, this is not true, and in fact the ad itself only appeared to the public at large on the RNC and Bush campaign web sites. While their consistent harping on this lie has gotten press, in the end it's backfired. Most recently, the Bush Campaign itself ran an ad with Kerry, Gore, Dean and Hitler, referencing the contest ad, and they came under heavy criticism. In another attack, right-wing partisans launched a campaign intended to shut down the MoveOn.org Voter Fund itself through the Federal Election Commission and to chill contributions from big and small contributors. Again, they failed, and support for MoveOn and others opposing the administration has been very robust, especially from the new small contributors many organizations are reaching through the Internet. The bottom line is that the attacks have raised the profile of MoveOn and opposition to the Bush administration in general, and this prominence helps us every day in getting out our message.

We are continually grateful for the incredible support and trust extended to us by you and other MoveOn members. We're great optimists, because we're in touch with millions of people who are working to make a difference. We're also optimistic because the work is yielding strong results. America is hearing the truth about the Bush administration. Now it's time to drive it home. Soon we'll let you know what's next in our campaign to take back America. But for now, we just want to thank you for making these results possible.


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Thursday, July 15, 2004

Wednesday, July 14, 2004

Philippines political situation

President Gloria Arroyo of the Phillippines has been blasted by the United States for caving to terrorism. But she wasn't elected to support Bush's crumbling coalition. In fact, she barely beat Fernando Poe Junior and faces more pressing problems from her constituents.

Many of Arroyo's rivals believe the election was a fraud and stand ready to pounce on Arroyo for any perceived mistakes. The economy in the Phillippines and government spending are also taking their toll on the recently re-elected President.

In fact, last Friday 1,500 Poe supporters protested to the point that authorities needed water cannons to disperse the protesters.

In the case of Angelo de la Cruz, it appears that Arroyo bungled the deal:

The twist of the events is the regrettable. Sto. Tomas said it was necessary for her to announce the news presumably to break the tension gripping the family of De la Cruz and the people in his barangay in New Mexico, Pampanga. She was right. The news was greeted with jubilation.

Then, the regrettable followed. And she was blamed for making the announcement. Otherwise, she would have been thanked for doing it. Responsibility is two-ended.

Actually, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo imposed a news blackout on the negotiation. While the blackout was out of her responsibility to avoid complication, media did not welcome it as it suppressed the freedom of information.

The reversal of events in the case of De la Cruz should make media ponder on where freedom ends and where responsibility begins. There is no clearly set boundary. Every case must be studied closely. An abuse of freedom at the sacrifice of responsibility can be regrettable.


While the Cruz deal may momentarily help Arroyo's standing at home, it will do little to slow down the opposition that will be attacking her every move for the next six years.

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Gonzo on Nader

Examining Gonzo's column supporting Ralph Nader.

These days it's popular, particularly in progressive circles, to attack presidential candidate Ralph Nader and his running mate, Peter Camejo.

How can I dispute this? But who cares what is "popular" in progressive circles? Is that Gonzo's political aim, to be popular?


Votes for Nader would likely otherwise go to Sen. John Kerry, and so the fear is that President Bush will be re-elected -- a possibility that naturally engenders strong feelings. But why is the right solution to attack Nader, who genuinely holds views different from those of Kerry and Bush? After all, Nader and Camejo are simply running for public office in a democracy.

Nader and Camejo aren't running for office, they're trying to trip a candidate in a real race. As for attacking Nader, that is what you get when you play spoiler.


The problem isn't that Nader and Camejo represent a duplicative platform, or fail to address issues being ignored by the two major parties -- it's simply that their running cannot be accommodated within our two-party system. So the answer, for many, is that they shouldn't run. But why make the solution an undemocratic one? Why not insist that the system be changed?

Great. Change the system. But until then, play by the rules we have now where a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush.


Do you really think it's an accident that the Democrats can't come up with a solution to the spoiler problem? Ask yourself, have they spent four years trying to reform the Electoral College? Or calling for majority elections so that we don't get a repeat of Florida -- an election decided by a plurality victory? Why blame Nader?

Good point, the Democrats have not re-written the constitution since Nader elected Bush.


One need only look at the two major candidates for president to see how much of a failure our political system is. On virtually every issue of significance, the candidates appear to be in agreement.

Where does he get this shit? Oh yeah, Nader said it. Remember when Nader said in 2000 that his candidacy would move the country to the left. Dumbass.


For instance, they both supported the war in Iraq (although Kerry believes Bush is mishandling matters and would like 20,000 more troops in the region), and both supported the Patriot Act (arguably the worst attack on civil liberties this country has seen in the last half-century). Both opposed the Kyoto Accords, which would have begun to address global warming, and both supported the World Trade Organization agreements, which subjugate our national and local interests to international commercial ones. Neither supports gay marriage, and even concerning the abortion question, Kerry says he'll appoint anti-abortion judges to the federal courts (but he says he'll make sure they don't want to repeal Roe v. Wade).

We gave you a raise, why don't you buy a fucking newspaper.


So, who is kidding whom? The progressives who are self-righteous in their condemnation of Nader, or those who believe the Democrats are not an opposition party?

Continuing to excuse the Democrats for not addressing the spoiler problem only ensures that the problem will not get fixed. Excusing Kerry from making concessions in this regard before you vote for him likewise ensures that the problem will not get fixed. Participating in attacks on Nader for running only props up an undemocratic system that must be reformed.

Oh, so Kerry should promise to re-write the constitution if we wants Gonzo to return his calls? Attacking Nader helps beat Bush, which is what progressives who care about more than popularity are focusing on this year.


The stakes are not one presidential race, but rather whether a diversity of ideas will ever reach Congress. Without this reform there will only ever be one congressperson with the courage to oppose the war in Iraq. There will only be one senator to vote against the Patriot Act. This state of affairs is so bleak that pretending there is an opposition party in our two-party system can only charitably be called foolish. I hate to say it, but it's true.

Again that whole opposition party thing. You're right, the Democratic Party isn't an opposition party. Right now, it is the unity party.


Those who continue to say that Nader ruined the 2000 election ignore that over 7 million Democrats voted for Bush -- 250,000 of them in Florida. They ignore that 6,600 votes in Palm Beach were spoiled by a butterfly ballot designed by a Democrat. Instead, they attack Nader, who has dedicated his entire adult life to fighting for consumer and civil rights. He has been a stalwart against growing corporate power. His running mate, Peter Camejo, has written on post-Civil War Reconstruction and has been a pioneer on socially responsible investing. The Nader/Camejo ticket offers voters something very different.

The Nader/Camejo ticket offers four more years of the same.


Attack them all you want, but years from now Nader and Camejo's effort will be remembered with Upton Sinclair's "End Poverty in California" campaign for governor of California and with the presidential efforts of Norman Thomas, Henry Wallace, Eugene Debs and Bob LaFollette. They will be remembered as men who fought to make this a better democracy.

There it is again, the whole popularity thing. Sorry Matt, but it isn't cool to vote for Nader.


- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Oakland Mayor Willie Brown

The balloon rises via PJ:

When convention-goers fill up restaurants at night, the pols eat early. So, there at 12:15 p.m. Tuesday at the North Beach Restaurant's window table was Willie Brown ... sitting at the very table where, the night before, friends of Jerry Brown were plotting to persuade Willie Brown to run for Mayor of Oakland, succeeding Jerry Brown. ... That's North Beach, where the successful evolves into fusions of old tastes and new techniques, whether it's fine wine, fine food, or the fine art of politics. ...



- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Saturday, July 10, 2004

Fridley

I posted the contact information for R.L. Fridley and Fridley Theatres and when I woke up this morning I found the information all over.

Citizens for Legitimate Government (with their giant email list) pulled no punches with the following recap:

Midwest Theaters Ban 'Fahrenheit 9/11' --The president of a company that owns movie theaters in Iowa and Nebraska is refusing to show director Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11." R.L. Fridley, owner [and Reichwing whore] of Des Moines-based Fridley Theatres, says the controversial documentary incites 'terrorism.' [Contact information for censorship terrorist R.L. Fridley and his Reichwing theatres:]

R.L. Fridley
3603 Davisson Rd
Des Moines, IA 50310
515-279-9866

Fridley Theatres
1321 Walnut St.
Des Moines, IA 50309
515-282-9287

beth@fridleytheatres.com or renea@fridleytheatres.com

[Contact info, courtesy: robertbrigham.blogspot.com]




- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress

Friday, July 09, 2004

Reading

Across the Atlantic | Justene Adamec | AfricaPundit | The Agitator | Allah | Alphecca | Ann Althouse | Steven Antler | A Small Victory | Atlantic Blog | Charles Austin | Professor Bainbridge | Baldilocks | Jack Balkin | Zachary Barbera | John Perry Barlow | Baseball Crank | Howard Bashman | N.Z. Bear | Mitch Berg | Big Arm Woman | Bigwig | BitchGirls | Blackfive | Tim Blair | Blaster's Blog | Blogosferics | Blogs of War | Rebecca Blood | The Bloviator | Moira Breen | Edward Boyd | Stuart Buck | Burchismo | Mark Byron | C.D. Harris | Frank Cagle | Brian Carnell | Cato the Youngest | Steven Chapman | ChicagoBoyz | Citizen Smash | Joshua Claybourn | Cold Fury | John Cole | Ed Cone | Jeff Cooper | Susanna Cornett | Colby Cosh | CounterRevolutionary | Bo Cowgill | Clayton Cramer | Cranky Professor | Crescat Sententia | Critical Mass | Crooked Timber | Cori Dauber | Deinonychus | Brad DeLong | Demosthenes | Steven Den Beste | Nick Denton | Martin Devon | Discriminations | Ben Domenech | Hossein Derakshan | DPM | Daniel Drezner | Ed Driscoll | Electrolite | John Ellis | Ernie the Attorney | Dean Esmay | Amitai Etzioni | Gary Farber | The Fat Guy | February 30 | Howard Fienberg | Flit | Dr. Frank | Fraters Libertas | Fried Man | FuturePundit | Rich Galen | GedankenPundit | Geek Press | Gene Expression | Jeff Goldstein | GreatestJeneration | Stephen Green | Gut Rumbles | Gweilo Diaries | HaightSpeech | Rich Hailey | Andrea Harris | Heather Havrilesky | Hawspipe | Jim Henley | William Hobbs | Kevin Holtsberry | The Homeless Guy | Hoosier Review | Horologium | Horsefeathers | Denise Howell | Matthew Hoy | Diana Hsieh | IMAO | Iberian Notes | InstaLawyer | IsntaPundit | Joanne Jacobs | Jeff Jarvis | Jessica's Well | Charles Johnson | Brothers Judd | Kate | Lynne Kiesling | Kathy Kinsley | Mark Kleiman | Alex Knapp | Dave Kopel | Jason Kottke | J.D. Lasica | Ken Layne | Kitchen Cabinet | LawMeme | Larry Lessig | James Lileks | Brian Linse | Listen Missy | Andrew Lloyd | Loco Parentis | Derek Lowe | Donald Luskin | Kieran Lyons | Megan McArdle | MadPony | Dr. Manhattan | Jay Manifold | Master of None | MCJ | H.D. Miller | Jim Miller | MinuteMan | Misha | Chris Mooney | Moxie | Mudville Gazette | Eric Muller | Iain Murray | Charles Murtaugh | Robert Musil | NanoDot | No Watermelons | Fredrik Norman | Brendan O'Neill | Obscure Store | Oliver & Watson | Andrew Olmsted | Dawn Olsen | Walter Olson | Howard Owens | OxBlog | Suman Palit | Damian Penny | Bill Peschel | Photon Courier | Tony Pierce | David Pinto | Stephen Pollard | Aziz Poonawalla | Jerry Pournelle | Power Line | Quare | Bill Quick | Rabbit Blog | Rantburg | Eric S. Raymond | RealClearPolitics | Right Wing News | Robin Roberts | Matt Rustler | Samizdata | John Scalzi | SCSU Scholars | Doc Searls | Andrea See | Donald Sensing | Stefan Sharkansky | Arthur Silber | Silent Running | Geitner Simmons | Laurence Simon | Roger L. Simon | Lynn Sislo | SKBubba | Skippy | Sgt. Stryker | Mike Silverman | Rand Simberg | SmartGenes | Sofia Sideshow | Natalie Solent | SpinSanity | Spinsters | Spoons | Bjorn Staerk | Sari Stein | Reid Stott | Tacitus | TalkLeft | Kim du Toit | Tonecluster | Jim Treacher | Eve Tushnet | Ublog | Howard Veit | The Volokh Conspiracy | War Liberal | Will Warren | Dr. Weevil | John Weidner | Matt Welch | Bill Whittle | Oliver Willis | Winds of Change | Dave Winer | Wunderkinder | Matthew Yglesias | Meryl Yourish | Pejman Yousefzadeh | Yuppies of Zion | Zogby Blog

A Moveable Beast | A N O M A L Y | A Small Victory | AboutItALL | Adam Curry | Adam's SmileZone | Adrants | Aged & Confused | Alas, a blog | Allan Moult | Altered Perception | Alterman, Eric | always write | amancay.com | ambimb | Amish Tech Support | Andrew Sullivan | Angelchrys | Annessa | Arrogant Rants | Atrios/Eschaton | Backup Brain | Badri | Bias | Bibb's Revenge | Big Pink Cookie | Bill Hobbs | Biz Stone | Blog Daddy | Blog Left | Blog Privett | Blogdom | Blues Blog | Bogh, Elizabeth | Boochakanan | Bozzy's World | Brad Boyson (E=MC2) | Brian Kane | Bryan Bell | buffoonery | Buzz Machine / Jeff Jarvis | By Sand and Sea | Caeli Dictum | CalPundit | Cariads Realm | Catalogablog | Caveat Lector | chastitycatt | cheesybikini? | Chris Pirillo | Confused Kid | Country Keepers | Country Living / Escape | Cranky Chick | Creditwrench | DaGoddess | Daily Kos | Dan Bricklin | Dan Gillmor | Dane Carlson | Dargelos' Journal | Darius Trucker | DataAngel | Dave Barry | Dave Hill | Davezilla | dcthornton | Debs Mouse Spot | Decafbad | Delacour | Delirious Cool | Denton, Nick | Design Kitten | Disarranging Mine | divagation.com | dive into mark | DiVERSiONZ | dixiblog | Doc Searls | dog:blog :: cat:chat | Dog News | Donald Sensing | dreaming in denmark | Dreaming Witch | Drezner,Daniel | dullest blog | Eject!Eject!Eject! | England's Sword | Eraine | Erik Benson | ErosBlog | everything falls | Feeny's | fmr*oi | forty.something | Gamer's Nook | Garden Spot | Gary Turner | Geek News | geekgrrl | geeky chick | girlwithagun | Gnome-Girl | Good News in Iraq | Google Puppet | Graphic Truth | Green Fairy | Hairy Eyeball | Heartened | Hestia Chronicles | hidden city | Homeless Guy | Howard Bashman | HughHewitt | Hugin and Munin | ickle fiction | Iddybud | ignispati | IIT-JEE | Indiboi.com | Indigo Blog | indigoddess | Indigo Ocean | Inside Magic | insignificant thoughts | Inspiranote | InstaPundit | Intellectualize.org | Islam-4-Real | J.D. Lasica | Jae's World | James Bow | Jamie's | Jay Allen | Jay-Blog | Jenett.Radio | Jill Walker | Joho the Blog | Joi Ito | Joshua | Journal Life | Jumping Monkeys | JustOneMinute (Tom Maguire) | Just a Gwai Lo | Justin Pagano | jwrblog- Jeff Rine | K-SergioCarvalho | kadyellebee | Kalilily | Kane Blues | KaraC | Kasia | Kaus, Mickey | keanuvision | Kid's Korner | Killing Han | Kottke | Ktar6 | Lance Heathville | Languagehat | Last Day of My Life | Lawrence Lessig | Leptard | Lileks, James | Liquid Courage | Little Green Football | little orange crow | little. yellow. different. | Living w/o Microsoft | Loosely Coupled | LT SMASH | Ludwig | Lugar Nenhum | Luskin, Donald | Macdara Conroy | Mad Kane | Marc North | Marcus Brown | Marmalade | Matilda444 | Matty G | MaxSpeak | Meg Hourihan | meryl.net | Midwest Bloggin' | Mike McBride | Mildly Suicidal | Missy Williams | Munnecke, Tom | Musil, Robert | naladahc | Neurotic Fishbowl | Newsrack | nicedoggie.net | Nivlac.com (Gina) | No War Blog | Nonsense Verse | Not So Girlie (SomeGirl.net) | Nukevet Blog | NZPundit | Oklahoma Wine News | Oliver Willis | one girl's life | onegoodmove | Ordinary Morning | Overlawyered | Owl's Diary | oxymoronic | Painted-Turtle | PapaScott | patrickWeb | Patriot Blog | Peer2all | Philip Greenspun | photo matt | photojunkie | phpMP | Piano Forte | Pickle Juice | pinkstar.org | Pinku | pippa said | Pizza Dreams | Planet Peschel | Plum Crazy | Polibus | Political Pulpit | PoliZeros | Prara | Quantum Philosophy | Quasi-Pundit | Questions… | quidnunc.org | rabbit blog | Rachel Lucas | Radio.Weblogs | Raed, Where is | rageboy (egr) | Rainbow's | Rantburg | Rant-O-Rama | Real Lans | redsugar muse | Rex Hammock | Rhetorica | Right Thoughts | Right-Thinking | Rites of Passage | Rob Fahrni | RobbyB | Robert Prather | Rodent Regatta | Romenesko | RuminateThis | Sakamuyo | Sarah's Journal | Satan's Laundromat | Skineegrrl Action! | Schultz,Nick | Scripting News (Dave Winer) | SDAI-TECH1 | Sean Kirby | Seeds of a Madness Flower | Seth-Tech | sevitz | Sgt. Stryker | Shamrock Songs | Silflay Hraka | Slant/Point | sLesTa | snazzykat | Solonor's | South Knox Bubba | sphinx lounge | Spinsanity | Steven Vore | Sunidesus | swerdloff | Talking Points Memo | TalkLeft | TampaTantrum (Ain't too proud to beg) | Tax Guru | Technicolor Day | Terreus | Textism | The Fat Guy | theosebes | ThymeWise | Tim Blair | Tom Tomorrow | Tomalak's Realm | tranquileye | Transterrestrial Musings | Tribolum | TummyMonsters | Turkish Torque | twodolla.org | uberchick | Unix Gal | usr/bin/geek | USS Clueless | vejadu | Velcrometer | Very Happy | Virginia Postrel | Vodka Pundit | waferbaby | Web Voice | Webmercial.dk | Webspiffy | Wendy Knits | What is This? | Who Killed Theresa? | Whump.com | Wi-Fi Networking | Wil Wheaton | Witold Riedel | Wry Writer | XMLHead | Yin Blog | Z o r bl o g | Zeldman, Jeffrey


Ruthless Hack
McGridlock

- Bob Brigham
Bay to the Beltway
Online + Campaigns + Politics + Elections + San Francisco + Board of Supervisors + News + Blogs + Presidential + Battleground + Senate + Congress